Landmark 163 · Trial in people

CALM-PD β-CIT and REAL-PET

In short

Two trials found that starting with pramipexole or ropinirole instead of levodopa slowed the loss of dopamine signal on brain scans, but neither showed that people were clinically protected.

What it is
Trial in people
Outcome
Replaced by a newer approach
When
2002–2003
Size
268 people
Research lane
Trial methods & regulation
Trial registry
NCT00321854
Last checked
19 Oct 2026

The research record

This is the project's file for this landmark, as written and checked. Sources are listed at the end; anything not yet confirmed is marked "Not yet verified".

Who

CALM-PD β-CIT: the Parkinson Study Group (JAMA, April 2002), a substudy of the 301-person CALM-PD trial (JAMA 2000), 82 people at 17 sites in the US and Canada, enrolled 1996–97. REAL-PET: Alan Whone, David Brooks and the REAL-PET Study Group (Annals of Neurology, July 2003), 186 people. The n above is the 82 + 186 total across both imaging groups.

What happened

Both used a scan as a stand-in for nerve-cell loss, since the clinical scales are shaped by symptom drugs (landmark 1 explains the dopamine system they track).

  • CALM-PD β-CIT. Of the main trial's patients, 82 had SPECT scans (β-CIT, which measures dopamine transporters on nerve endings). Randomised double-blind to pramipexole (n=42) or levodopa (n=40). Striatal uptake fell by 16.0% on pramipexole versus 25.5% on levodopa after 46 months (P=0.01; the main measure). Loss correlated with UPDRS change (r = −0.40, P=0.001).
  • REAL-PET. 186 people with early untreated Parkinson's were randomised 1:1 to ropinirole or levodopa for 2 years; 162 were eligible for analysis. In the putamen, PET uptake of 18F-dopa fell 13.4% on ropinirole (n=68) versus 20.3% on levodopa (n=59) (P=0.022; 95% CI 0.65 to 13.06). The authors called this slower progression.
  • The catch. Neither trial had a placebo arm, so the gap could mean the agonist slowed loss or that levodopa sped it up (the question left open by landmark 161); either drug could also change tracer uptake directly. Neither trial showed clinical protection.

Why it moved us toward a cure

These trials gave hope that scans could stand in for years of clinical follow-up. PROUD (landmark 165), a placebo-controlled delayed-start trial of pramipexole (535 people), found no difference in 15-month UPDRS (−0.4, 95% CI −2.2 to 1.4) or in scan loss (−15.1% vs −14.6%) and did not support disease modification.

Outcome

Superseded. The scan advantage did not translate into clinical proof, and the better-controlled PROUD trial did not support disease modification by pramipexole.

Sources

How it connects

Built on

Led to

See it on the research map

Report an error on this page

Back to top