Landmark 311 · Trial in people
Molecular hydrogen trials
A pilot in 17 people looked good. A larger trial in 178 people found no difference from placebo.
In short
Drinking hydrogen-rich water improved scores in a 17-person Japanese pilot, but the 178-person follow-up found no difference from placebo, and a US trial stopped after enrolling two people.
- What it is
- Trial in people
- Outcome
- Did not work
- When
- 2013–2021
- Size
- 178 people · Phase 2
- Approach
- Help cells clean up
- Research lane
- Oxidative stress
- Trial registry
- NCT03971617
- Last checked
- 19 Oct 2026
The research record
This is the project's file for this landmark, as written and checked. Sources are listed at the end; anything not yet confirmed is marked "Not yet verified".
Who
Asako Yoritaka, Nobutaka Hattori and colleagues at Juntendo University and 14 Japanese hospitals; and Carine Maurer at Stony Brook University, New York.
What happened
Molecular hydrogen (H2) is a gas that, in cell and animal studies, mops up the most reactive oxygen molecules. Oxidative stress, damage from such molecules, is thought to hurt dopamine neurons; landmark 129 found the brain's main antioxidant, glutathione, depleted in the nigra.
- Pilot (2013). In Movement Disorders, 17 levodopa-treated patients drank 1,000 mL a day of hydrogen water or plain water for 48 weeks. Total UPDRS (a disease rating scale) improved by 5.7 points in the hydrogen group (n = 9) and worsened by 4.1 in the placebo group (n = 8), a difference the authors called significant (P < 0.05). The authors later acknowledged that a pilot of this size cannot tell symptom relief from slowing.
- Multicentre trial (published 2018). Same design in 178 patients at 14 hospitals (154 on levodopa, 24 not), 1,000 mL a day for 72 weeks, main measure change in total UPDRS. The Japanese grant report states no significant difference (p > 0.05); the water was safe but did not help. The Movement Disorders paper (2018;33:1505) is a short report; I could not read its abstract.
- Stony Brook (NCT03971617). Phase 2/3, hydrogen-producing tablets with 80 mg magnesium versus matching placebo, planned 70 early-stage patients for 52 weeks, primary outcome safety. It ran May 2019 to April 2021, was terminated for "insufficient enrollment" and had 2 participants (1 per arm), neither with adverse events.
Why it moved us toward a cure
It is a clean example of a small positive pilot being refuted at scale, in line with the antioxidant failures in the same branch (for example landmark 66, urate). It also shows a mechanism (reactive oxygen) can be real in cells while a hydrogen drink has no effect in people.
Outcome
Dead end. No further hydrogen trial for disease modification found.
Sources
- Yoritaka et al., Mov Disord 2013;28:836, DOI 10.1002/mds.25375
- Yoritaka et al., Mov Disord 2018;33:1505, DOI 10.1002/mds.27472
- Protocol, BMC Neurol 2016, DOI 10.1186/s12883-016-0589-0
- KAKEN final research report (source for the null 178-person result)
- ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03971617 (API, 19 Oct 2026)
- Not yet verified: the 2018 paper's own numbers (its abstract was unavailable); whether the multicentre trial was formally named a Phase 2; the 2013 page ranges (volume/page taken from the DOI record only).
How it connects
Built on
- builds on Glutathione loss in the nigra · 1994
Led to
None recorded.